2008/4/9 tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org>:
>
>
>  On 8-Apr-08, at 3:09 PM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>
>
> > On 07.04.2008, at 17:02, tim Rowledge wrote:
> >
> > > I think there is a bit of a logical problem here ins that if the system
> *didn't* have 'all that junk' the immediate result would be complaints that
> 'it doesn't have all that useful stuff like other systems'.
> > >
> >
> >
> > IMHO in other systems the 'junk' is simply not that much in-your-face as
> in the SystemBrowser. It's hidden in library code that you never look at
> except for its documented API.
> >
>
>  Interesting way of looking at it. Perhaps it might be sensible to have a
> browser for typical use that shows much less detail of the 'kernel' classes
> so as to cause less fear and concern for less experienced developers. We did
> something along those lines for LearningWorks with reasonable success.
>
>  We'd need to actually *have* a 'documented API' of course....
>

This, i think, could be achieved by introducing a some kind of
view-sets, where developer can choose
sets of classes/packages visible by browser.
Sometimes(All the time) its more convenient to work only with
particular set of classes, so all commands like
senders/implementors/references etc will use only given set for
searching.
Btw, this was discussed previously.

>
>  tim
>  --
>  tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
>  Strange OpCodes: SDL: Shift Disk Left
>
>
>
>



-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.