Perhaps unhandled errors could be made more easily pluggable for
deployment...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> [mailto:squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org]On Behalf Of John
> M McIntosh
> Sent: 05 August 2008 6:55 PM
> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
> Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Re: About controlling debugger popping up
>
>
> Well people won't give you even an email address. This unfortunate
> breaks part of the problem question answer cycle. Although we might
> push all the stacks for all the processes and most of the data values,
> that sometimes only shows: Gee how did they do that, but then you have
> no way to ask what they were doing...  Suggestions on how to entice
> that information out of a user is welcome.
> >