2008/8/14 Norbert Hartl <norbert at hartl.name>:
> On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 13:21 +0200, Philippe Marschall wrote:
>> 2008/8/14 Norbert Hartl <norbert at hartl.name>:
>> > On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 16:26 -0700, Avi Bryant wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 1:29 AM, Lukas Renggli <renggli at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I am would like to see some documentation on how to migrate from the
>> >> > old Monticello. Also I am eagerly awaiting the network repositories.
>> >>
>> >> Here's a strategy that I think would work to allow networked
>> >> collaboration with MC2 in its current state.  Colin, let me know if
>> >> I'm making any faulty assumptions here or misremembering how MC2
>> >> works.
>> >>
>> >> 1. For your project, create a separate file repository for each
>> >> developer.  So, Lukas, if you, Colin and I were all collaborating on
>> >> something, we would have lr.mcr, avi.mcr, and cwp.mcr.
>> >> 2. Set up a script which rsyncs these three files to a shared
>> >> location.  Each developer should have this script set up to *upload*
>> >> their own mcr and to *download* everyone else's.
>> >> 3. Commit to your own repository (I would commit to avi.mcr), and then
>> >> run the script.  Or, have a cron job which runs it every few minutes.
>> >>
>> >> Since the project has all three repos added, everyone's versions
>> >> should show up together in the UI.  Since each developer is only
>> >> modifying his own file, there shouldn't be any conflicts at the file
>> >> level.  Since the .mcr files are always only appended to, rsync should
>> >> be able to update them quite efficiently (right?).  And although there
>> >> would be some duplication (each developer's repo would contain its own
>> >> copy of most of the method versions), it would be O(developers) not
>> >> O(versions) as MC1 is.
>> >>
>> >> Thoughts?
>> >
>> > We do a similar setup with MC1. I did it because there was no easy
>> > ssl support for http repositores.
>>
>> http://www.squeaksource.com/monticellossl.html
>>
> Thanks, I started in Oct 2006 the project in Jan 2007 :) Just kidding.
> I was aware of the curl plugin but not of this project. Thanks for
> pointing me to it! Is it usable on windows as well?

Yes, very much so:
http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5865

Cheers
Philippe