Thanks...the more I thought about it, the more complicated I realized this
questions was; if you could "selectively save" a class and sync it up with
any stored simple objects, you really wouldn't need much else at all for a
lot of applications!
Thanks again,

Rob

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 3:37 AM, Ramon Leon <ramon.leon at allresnet.com>wrote:

> > Hey Ramon...
> >
> > Just wondering, only slightly off topic, if you can save the
> > class itself with SandstoneDb?  I am doing some dynamic
> > compilation, and was wondering if I can use SandstoneDb to
> > save changes to the class without saving the entire image, or
> > if I should just save the image when I add new methods or
> > update class side variables?
> >
> > Just wondering if there is a more "compact" way of saving
> > just one class instead of the entire image?
> >
> > Rob
>
> No, you'll need to save your image, SandstoneDb just saves simple objects.
>
> Ramon Leon
> http://onsmalltalk.com
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20080827/5ab3822f/attachment.htm