[squeak-dev] Re: [Question] nil, true, false in array literals
Gerardo Richarte
gera at corest.com
Wed Dec 3 19:34:25 UTC 2008
> you would say:
>
> #(1 2.0 true false 'string' #foo #bar #baz)
>
> in which case you might even be able to get rid of {} ...
if my opinion counts for anything, this is what I would like most.
Explicit and homogeneous syntax, while still simple enough. Of course,
we already have a syntax, and we are very likely not going to change
it... given that it is valid syntax today, I'll just start using it :)
richie
richie
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|