[squeak-dev] Re: [Question] nil, true, false in array literals

Gerardo Richarte gera at corest.com
Wed Dec 3 19:34:25 UTC 2008

> you would say:
>   #(1 2.0 true false 'string' #foo #bar #baz)
> in which case you might even be able to get rid of {} ...

if my opinion counts for anything, this is what I would like most. 
Explicit and homogeneous syntax, while still simple enough. Of course, 
we already have a syntax, and we are very likely not going to change 
it... given that it is valid syntax today, I'll just start using it :)



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list