[squeak-dev] Re: [Question] nil, true, false in array literals
Igor Stasenko
siguctua at gmail.com
Wed Dec 3 20:04:53 UTC 2008
2008/12/3 Gerardo Richarte <gera at corest.com>:
>
>> you would say:
>>
>> #(1 2.0 true false 'string' #foo #bar #baz)
>>
>> in which case you might even be able to get rid of {} ...
>
> if my opinion counts for anything, this is what I would like most. Explicit
> and homogeneous syntax, while still simple enough. Of course, we already
> have a syntax, and we are very likely not going to change it... given that
> it is valid syntax today, I'll just start using it :)
>
Your opinion is important, otherwise i wouldn't open this discussion
and just do things in a way i like to do without asking anyone :)
> richie
>
> richie
>
>
--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|