[squeak-dev] Forking
Ken Causey
ken at kencausey.com
Mon Dec 8 16:44:14 UTC 2008
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 10:12 -0600, Tim Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Off Topic: Looks like there is debate stirring among the Ruby
> community on whether to fork Ruby to experiment with parallelization,
> etc. Sounds awfully familiar.
>
> http://pragdave.blogs.pragprog.com/pragdave/2008/12/forking-rubymy-rubyconf-keynote-is-now-up.html
>
> On Topic: A Google search for "squeak roadmap 3.11" turns up no
> applicable results. Is there a formal roadmap? I am most curious
> about what will happen to 3.10 when 3.11 is released.
Oh, I didn't get this far down the message for some reason before I
replied before.
What do you expect to happen to 3.10? I think there must be some sort
of misunderstanding. 3.11 is a descendant of 3.10. So barring a bug
addressing release of some kind 3.10 is basically done.
Ken
>
> Thanks,
> TimJ
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20081208/f57c89ef/attachment.pgp
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|