[squeak-dev] 3.11 artifacts observations and a little bit of curiosity.

Keith Hodges keith_hodges at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Dec 18 22:07:26 UTC 2008

Chris Cunningham wrote:
> So, why not call it 3.11bc or 3.11.0bc?  You do definitely have the
> authority to use that name.
> -Chris
Because it is an image derived from 3.10 for building stuff that works
in 3.10. The packages definitions/universe etc that you would expect to
work in this image are the 3.10 ones, not the 3.11 ones.


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list