Complexity and starting over on the JVM
andreas.raab at gmx.de
Tue Feb 5 03:08:32 UTC 2008
Paul D. Fernhout wrote:
> Andreas Raab wrote:
>> Paul D. Fernhout wrote:
>>> So, for the 21st century, Squeak gets underscore *wrong*.
>>> And for a dozen years. Every knows it is wrong. There was even a recent
>>> discussion on it. It still can't be fixed!
>> Sure it can. Croquet fixed it.
> That's exactly my point. :-) Why only Croquet (or some other images)?
Because you need authority to make certain changes and these changes
certainly will be seen as controversial by some. And no, that's not your
point as far as I can tell - unless your point is that there is no
unambiguous authority for Squeak today (with which I agree).
More information about the Squeak-dev