On Feb 8, 2008 1:32 PM, Yoshiki Ohshima <yoshiki at vpri.org> wrote:

> >      Yes, the #lowestPriority case would be a problem.  The
> >     #lowestPriority would be renamed to #reallyLowestPriority and new
> >     #lowestPriority would return #reallyLowestPriority+1?
> >
> > Would you seriously consider changing this in the squeak.org image?
>
>  I don't know the right answer to this question.  I understand that
> most of people don't need it and then don't want to have it.  OTOH, I
> don't mind to have it and that would prevent a few people in the
> future stumble on the problem...
>


In that case, the lowest priority idle thread needs to be of a lower
priority than #reallyLowestPriority, so I propose also adding
#actualReallyLowestPriority to be the lowest priority, then
#reallyLowestPriority to be #actualReallyLowestPriority+1 and
#lowestPriority to be #actualReallyLowestPriority+2.

Gulik.

-- 
http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg
http://gulik.pbwiki.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20080208/074bcf76/attachment.htm