#fork and deterministic resumption of the resulting process
Yoshiki Ohshima
yoshiki at vpri.org
Fri Feb 8 06:40:13 UTC 2008
John,
> If we consider a parallel-processing VM, then Andreas' patch won't come
> close to working, since it won't guarantee that the forked process isn't
> started too early. Therefore, I wasn't considering a parallel processing
> scheduler.
Neither the program that assumes to get #(1 2 3) from your example
code. So, these are "par", roughly speaking.
And, the patch makes the behavior easier to reason if we take
current implementation. So there is some value.
-- Yoshiki
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|