On Feb 25, 2008, at 10:42 , Damien Cassou wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Bert Freudenberg  
> <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>>
>>
>>  On Feb 25, 2008, at 9:23 , Damien Cassou wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Miguel Enrique Cobá Martínez
>>> <m.coba.m at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> itsme213 wrote:
>>>>> I the damien-3.10-web image size is quite large (129M) compared  
>>>>> to a
>>>>> comparably (not identical) loaded 3.9 Ramon's image (42M). Is
>>>>> that expected,
>>>>> or is it because as a beta it has not been trimmed etc.?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>  I noted this too. But if you save the original image from Damien
>>>> to a
>>>>  new image (for your everyday work, so you have the original image
>>>>  intact) the new saved image is trimmed to about 34MB.
>>>
>>> I can't trimmed my image with this method... Don't know what  
>>> happens.
>>
>>  Try a different VM?
>
> Mine is pretty recent and I think I compiled it myself through  
> subversion:
>
> $ squeak -version
> 3.9-12 #2 mercredi 10 octobre 2007, 18:07:20 (UTC+0200) version 4.1.3
> Squeak3.9alpha of 4 July 2005 [latest update: #7021]
> Linux bedous 2.6.22-14-generic #1 SMP Tue Oct 9 09:51:52 GMT 2007  
> i686 GNU/Linux
> default plugin location: /usr/local/lib/squeak/3.9-12/*.so
>
> Do you think I need to try another version?

Only if your VM is somehow special and does not collect garbage when  
saving. If the report above by Miguel is correct (that he simply  
loaded and saved the image) and the same does not work for you then  
it certainly must be the VM. Although I think this is rather  
unlikely. Try emptying the MC caches and saving.

- Bert -