Ok, future versions will be much smaller. Thanks.

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>
>
>  On Feb 25, 2008, at 10:42 , Damien Cassou wrote:
>
>  > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Bert Freudenberg
>  > <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>  On Feb 25, 2008, at 9:23 , Damien Cassou wrote:
>  >>
>  >>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Miguel Enrique Cobá Martínez
>  >>> <m.coba.m at gmail.com> wrote:
>  >>>>
>  >>>> itsme213 wrote:
>  >>>>> I the damien-3.10-web image size is quite large (129M) compared
>  >>>>> to a
>  >>>>> comparably (not identical) loaded 3.9 Ramon's image (42M). Is
>  >>>>> that expected,
>  >>>>> or is it because as a beta it has not been trimmed etc.?
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>>
>  >>>>  I noted this too. But if you save the original image from Damien
>  >>>> to a
>  >>>>  new image (for your everyday work, so you have the original image
>  >>>>  intact) the new saved image is trimmed to about 34MB.
>  >>>
>  >>> I can't trimmed my image with this method... Don't know what
>  >>> happens.
>  >>
>  >>  Try a different VM?
>  >
>  > Mine is pretty recent and I think I compiled it myself through
>  > subversion:
>  >
>  > $ squeak -version
>  > 3.9-12 #2 mercredi 10 octobre 2007, 18:07:20 (UTC+0200) version 4.1.3
>  > Squeak3.9alpha of 4 July 2005 [latest update: #7021]
>  > Linux bedous 2.6.22-14-generic #1 SMP Tue Oct 9 09:51:52 GMT 2007
>  > i686 GNU/Linux
>  > default plugin location: /usr/local/lib/squeak/3.9-12/*.so
>  >
>  > Do you think I need to try another version?
>
>  Only if your VM is somehow special and does not collect garbage when
>  saving. If the report above by Miguel is correct (that he simply
>  loaded and saved the image) and the same does not work for you then
>  it certainly must be the VM. Although I think this is rather
>  unlikely. Try emptying the MC caches and saving.
>
>  - Bert -
>
>
>
>



-- 
Damien Cassou