On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:26:20 +0100, Michael van der Gulik wrote:

> On 2/28/08, Klaus D. Witzel wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:12:10 +0100, Michael van der Gulik wrote:
>>
>> > On 2/27/08, Klaus D. Witzel wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I want to give priority of a class' hierarchy's bindings over that of
>> >> (self environment) when the latter defaults to the Smalltalk global
>> >> dictionary (as is the case today in most images).
>> >>
>> >> Attached is a patch which supports SharedPool as it was introduced in
>> >> -
>> >>
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2003-May/058391.html
>> >>
>> >
>> > The patch looks good to me. I especially like how you refer to  
>> Smalltalk as "nil environment".
>>
>> :)
>>
>> > I modified this code to get Namespaces resolving right.
>>
>> Did you mean this like, you adapted it to your Namespaces. If not, can  
>> you elaborate a bit, TIA.
>>
>
> Actually, on closer inspection, I didn't modify the method except to  
> remove
> shared pools, which can be implemented using Namespaces anyway.
>
> In my Namespaces, "aClass environment" returns the local namespace.

Ah :) Then, do you have a special browser (or patched) which evaluates a  
class definition in scope? What I found in .images, use of  
#defineClass:notifying: is insufficient for defining a class in scope  
other than global root Smalltalk :(

Whatever you already have for this, I'd like to use it :)

/Klaus

> Gulik.
>
>