beware GNU Smalltalk if you want to contribute to squeak
Paolo Bonzini
bonzini at gnu.org
Thu Jan 10 22:47:42 UTC 2008
> LGPL code is completely unacceptable for inclusion in the main Squeak
> distribution, and doubly so if it is code that the FSF holds the
> copyright to. RMS was unwilling to elaborate on the interpretation of
> the LGPL for image-based systems such as Squeak. In his view, including
> a single LGPL class makes the entire image into a "derived work" that
> can only be redistributed subject to the restrictions of the LGPL.
Do you have a pointer? I believe this is true for the GPL, but not for
the LGPL. I can tell you that it was pretty hard to convince him to
adopt the LGPL because he wanted to understand the ins and outs --
because there *is* a difference: if it were as you said, GPL or LGPL
would be completely the same. It's been a few years ago though, so
neither of us has those e-mails.
Anyway LGPL code is not compatible with MIT, so it is completely
unacceptable for inclusion in Squeak core independent of who is the
copyright holder.
Paolo
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|