Common enough to include it?
bonzini at gnu.org
Thu Jan 24 10:58:08 UTC 2008
Sebastian Sastre wrote:
> Hi Bert,
> as a convenience I don't present objections. The usability problem I
> saw on that is the convenience being a hidden feature. Ofcourse
> Collection>>"collect: aValuableOrSymbol" could suggest it's existence
> palliating that.
The biggest problem is that you define Symbol>>#value: and friends to
make Symbols and BlockClosures polymorphic with each other. But then
#numArgs is not polymorphic because
#asLowercase numArgs => 0
[ :x | x asLowercase ] => 1
More information about the Squeak-dev