El 7/4/08 8:35 AM, "Serge Stinckwich" <Serge.Stinckwich at gmail.com> escribió:

> You can still use FunSqueak.
> Ask Edgar about that.
> 
> --
> Serge Stinckwich
> http://blog.doesnotunderstand.org/


I plan to complete SqueakLight II for each newbie have lots of choices.
So people could start of smaller and modular Squeak and grow as he/she need,
any could end with FunSqueak or cook a his own.


http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6056 is the page, I add "how to" to some
questions I receive.

At the moment I working in a SLIIUniverses, a subset of Lex work for the
image could load the 3.10 Universes object, see attached picts

loadKnowPackages
"UCodeLoader loadKnowPackages"
| obj  loader req |
    loader _ CodeLoader new.
    loader baseURL: 'ftp.squeak.org/various_images/SqueakLight/SLupdates/'.
        
        req := loader createRequestFor: 'KnowPackages.obz' in:  HTTPLoader
default..
        
    obj := loader readObject: req.
 
KnowPackages := obj

Wondering if we need 888 packages , several doing the same thing.
Or I only should let one version of each ?

Edgar


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Picture 3.png
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 17731 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20080704/2385a714/Picture3.obj
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Picture 4.png
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 5060 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20080704/2385a714/Picture4.obj