[squeak-dev] Re: Maintenance of remote references
Adrian Lienhard
adi at netstyle.ch
Fri Jul 18 20:10:05 UTC 2008
On Jul 18, 2008, at 21:06 , Sebastian Sastre wrote:
> glad to hear that I'm not alone with this industrial crisis. The
> only thing I
> can think of is using sessions. So when a session is closed or
> expires the
> system notifies remote brokers telling the group of ids of objects
> to be
> considered free for that session (and of course eventually claimed
> if no other
> session is referencing them). Maybe you want/need a more general
> approach? If we
> deny to give up to consistency I don't see lots of alternatives. I'm
> starting to
> wonder what happen in real world to solve this problematic pattern-
> problem...
> hhmmm...
For what its worth, there was a paper with the title "Programming with
Live Distributed Objects" published at this year's ECOOP. Not sure,
though, if/how they solve the problem.
Cheers,
Adrian
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|