Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> stephane ducasse wrote:
>> I'm trying to understand the exact difference between using return: 
>> and not as a last statement of a on:do: block
> 
> There is none.  Not using return: was less portable (VSE and GNU 
> Smalltalk used resume: for the last statement if the exception is 
> resumable), but with Seaside relying on the ANSI behavior many dialects 
> are slowly changing.

Hm ... I don't quite recall but didn't ANSI specify that the behavior is 
undefined unless a specific handler response is invoked? In other words, 
*unless* you are specific about either #return: or #resume: the result 
may be implementation dependent?

Cheers,
   - Andreas