[squeak-dev] Re: SqueakMap is a "Showroom"
Janko Mivšek
janko.mivsek at eranova.si
Fri Jun 27 22:20:40 UTC 2008
Chris Muller wrote:
> Put another way, if we use SqueakMap solely as a tool for consumption
> of software, and Monticello for production (and consumption) of
> software, improve the bridge between the two (publishing) and we're
> basically Done..! Seriously, what else is missing?
I agree, this can be a easily achievable base for evolving further.
I have quite some time in mind to start with a first step: a SqueakMap
web "uplift", that is, a reimplementation of map.squeak.org to be more
user friendly but also more fresh looking and modern.
We can then make the next step in that evolution: adding a good
dependency support, with merging Universes approach or somehow
different. If we merge that part of Universes which seems to work really
well, we did a first unification: between SM and Universes. End user
will now be happy, installation will be as simple as possible: one click.
Next step is better and as user friendly as possible integration with
Monticello as in-image tool for package and version control. This would
be preferable for publishers.
Another step would be adding/merging Sake/Packages and LPF, at least as
I understand Keith's work.
Evolution and unification of existing tools, that's my proposal, not
revolution and doing everything from scratch again and again. Well, for
experimental purposes revolutionary approaches are welcome, but as we
can see, those projects loose breath somewhere in the middle. But we can
incorporate ideas from that experiments in our evolutionary tools.
That's how I see things.
Janko
--
Janko Mivšek
AIDA/Web
Smalltalk Web Application Server
http://www.aidaweb.si
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|