+1

Ken

P.S. How about spending time writing some useful code instead?

On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 16:37 -0800, tim Rowledge wrote:
> How is Squeak notably less serious as a name than
> java
> ruby
> BASIC
> Pascal
> SNOBOL
> lisp
> etc?
> 
> And why would I have any respect for a business that declines to use a  
> software system purely on the basis of the name anyway?
> 
> tim
> --
> tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
> Strange OpCodes: HEM: Hide Evidence of Malfunction
> 
> 
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20080304/0f8f1fef/attachment.pgp