On 14/03/2008, Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
> Igor Stasenko wrote:
>  > On 14/03/2008, Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
>  >> Igor Stasenko wrote:
>  >>  > If Janko can push things with Aida, i don't mind so. Between
>  >>  > stagnation and movement i choose movement.
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> I would recommend spending two minutes to think about how to roll out
>  >>  such a change and how to roll back if (god forbid) the job turns out too
>  >>  big, the tool not suited, or the volunteer in question getting run over
>  >>  by a bus. Only headless chickens move merely for the sake of movement ;-)
>  >>
>  >
>  > Well, i hope Janko understands how hard it can be. And if he really
>  > thinks that he capable to work things out, then why not. Nevertheless,
>  > we have to put trust in people time to time :)
>
>
> Sure. But part of trusting him to work things out is to trust him to
>  come up with a plan that can address these issues, no? (and by "plan" I
>  mean nothing complicated - just a staging site so that people can have a
>  look at it and the board can decide when it's ready to go live)
>

Yes, i'm fully agree with that.

>
>  > As i noticed, i'd vote for seasider, but if there is nobody else who
>  > can commit enough time to remake site and support it, then what
>  > choices do we have?
>
>
> We have the choice of the status quo.
>

I really don't care (as well as 99.9% of others) what software
delivers content to my browser
as long as it does it fast and site looking good and convenient to
navigate/find required information. The list, provided by Matthew
perfectly reflects that.

I would really better consider about inviting a good web designer to
refresh 'face' of squeak than about what platform to choose for
content management.
We both know that things sell themselves better if they're eye candy :)

>  Cheers,
>
>    - Andreas
>
>


-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.