[squeak-dev] I'm stepping down as WebTeam Leader Mars 31

Jason Rogers jacaetevha at gmail.com
Sat Mar 15 16:34:06 UTC 2008

Magma isn't possible in the current image.

I have never used ImageSegments, so I don't know if it's even possible
in the image we have.

I don't much mind how the content is backed up as long as it's easy,
minimal in size, and able to be used in a restoration.

On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Randal L. Schwartz
<merlyn at stonehenge.com> wrote:
> >>>>> "Jason" == Jason Rogers <jacaetevha at gmail.com> writes:
>  Jason>     - if the image holds the data, we have to snapshot and copy the
>  Jason> image -- but if the content is external, we can back up the content
>  Jason> more frequently (with a much better compression rate than the image)
>  Jason> and back up the image much less frequently
>  Jason> - the content should be easily manipulated, without requiring editing
>  Jason> the image directly
>  Jason> - the current image is quite old (3.7 variant, I believe) and doesn't
>  Jason> take advantage of recent improvements in Squeak (FastSocket comes to
>  Jason> mind)
>  Can we use ImageSegments or Magma for this?  I mean, saving the whole image
>  works, but we certainly want to use modern technology now that it's available.
>  --
>  Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
>  <merlyn at stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
>  Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
>  See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!

Jason Rogers

"I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live;
yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life
which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of
the Son of God, who loved me, and gave
himself for me."
 Galatians 2:20

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list