[squeak-dev] I'm stepping down as WebTeam Leader Mars 31
jacaetevha at gmail.com
Sat Mar 15 16:34:06 UTC 2008
Magma isn't possible in the current image.
I have never used ImageSegments, so I don't know if it's even possible
in the image we have.
I don't much mind how the content is backed up as long as it's easy,
minimal in size, and able to be used in a restoration.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Randal L. Schwartz
<merlyn at stonehenge.com> wrote:
> >>>>> "Jason" == Jason Rogers <jacaetevha at gmail.com> writes:
> Jason> - if the image holds the data, we have to snapshot and copy the
> Jason> image -- but if the content is external, we can back up the content
> Jason> more frequently (with a much better compression rate than the image)
> Jason> and back up the image much less frequently
> Jason> - the content should be easily manipulated, without requiring editing
> Jason> the image directly
> Jason> - the current image is quite old (3.7 variant, I believe) and doesn't
> Jason> take advantage of recent improvements in Squeak (FastSocket comes to
> Jason> mind)
> Can we use ImageSegments or Magma for this? I mean, saving the whole image
> works, but we certainly want to use modern technology now that it's available.
> Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
> <merlyn at stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
> Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
> See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
"I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live;
yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life
which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of
the Son of God, who loved me, and gave
himself for me."
More information about the Squeak-dev