[squeak-dev] Re: [ANN] Kernel methods license audit

Igor Stasenko siguctua at gmail.com
Thu Mar 20 19:54:18 UTC 2008

On 20/03/2008, Pavel Krivanek <squeak1 at continentalbrno.cz> wrote:
> Thank you for your offer, Igor. Have you signed the Squeak
>  Distribution Agreement (http://www.netjam.org/squeak/contributors/)? I
>  do not see you in the list.

I'm not in list, because i don't remember that i submitted any code to
squeak release :)
I found some bugs & proposed some patches but not in form, which can
be included in code w/o changes.
Do i need to sign agreement as well, or this only for people who
already there and need to sign it because of license changes?
Maybe i miss something, but isn't it will be easier to state clearly
and exclusively that if anyone want to see their code in squeak
release they should release it under MIT license,
otherwise they are free to release it as separate package with any
license they want?

Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list