Hi Stef,

it is from the latest kernel.image, namely morphicExt.image. However
the methods that need to be rewriten are shared with Squeak 3.10.

Cheers,
-- Pavel

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 8:50 PM, stephane ducasse
<stephane.ducasse at free.fr> wrote:
> pavel
>
>  from which image are you computing such information?
>
>  Stef
>
>
> On Mar 20, 2008, at 5:05 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
>
>  > Hi all,
>  >
>  > I've prepared current license audit of kernel methods, see:
>  >
>  > http://comtalk.eu/public/pub/KernelImage/license/licenseAudit1.csv
>  > http://comtalk.eu/public/pub/KernelImage/license/licenseAudit2.ods
>  > - overview of SqueakL methods in the kernel.image (OpenOffice format)
>  > http://comtalk.eu/public/pub/KernelImage/license/licenseAudit2.pdf
>  > - overview of SqueakL methods in the kernel.image (PDF format)
>  >
>  > For more information see Wiki page on the KernelImage SqueakSource
>  > repository:
>  > http://www.squeaksource.com/KernelImage.html
>  >
>  > We need to rewrite 332 methods.
>  > There are some methods that have similar source to Squeak 1.1 version.
>  > The first task is to convert them. For this task wee need two people
>  > (or two teams):
>  >
>  > - one will look at old and current implementation and will describe
>  > how must be the original source changed to do the same job as the
>  > current version. This description should be as general as possible -
>  > no code. For example "use ZeroDivide instead of general error",
>  > "LdInstLong was renamed to LoadLong" etc. Some descriptions are
>  > present in the old version of license audit
>  > (http://comtalk.eu/public/pub/KernelImage/license/license2.ods)
>  >
>  > - the second person/team must not see the current code! It will take
>  > the code from Squeak 1.1, will create new method and modify it as
>  > described by the first person. We already tested this process with
>  > Damien.
>  >
>  > So, volunteers?
>  >
>  > Cheers,
>  > -- Pavel
>  >
>  >
>
>
>