[squeak-dev] Re: Swazoo - LGPL or MIT?
philippe.marschall at gmail.com
Fri Mar 21 13:31:59 UTC 2008
2008/3/19, Philippe Marschall <philippe.marschall at gmail.com>:
> 2008/3/19, Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek at eranova.si>:
> > Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > >> Do I interpret the LGPL correctly that the Seaside Swazoo adapter
> > >> (subclass of a a Swazoo class) would need to be LGPL as well?
> > >
> > > No, Site is pretty much the interface that Swazoo exposes to its users;
> > > you cannot *use* Swazoo without subclassing Site. Subclassing
> > > HeaderField would be another story.
> > We had just recently a semi-official and a bit broader (and very simple
> > actually) interpretation. Using it on Swazoo: LGPL is covered if you
> > extend Swazoo by some other package as is in your case, Philippe. Reason
> > IMHO is simple: borders between Swazoo and code it uses it is preserved
> > and clear.
> Sorry I have some problems parsing this. I need a clear and official
> response whether the Swazoo Seaside Adapter needs to be under LGPL. If
> not what changes we are allowed to make without it having to move to
I need a clear, official and legal waterproof answer on this.
More information about the Squeak-dev