[squeak-dev] Re: Swazoo - LGPL or MIT?
renggli at gmail.com
Sat Mar 22 07:05:02 UTC 2008
> > If you manage to persuade the people who contributed to Swazoo to
> > switch the license, then fair enough. Until then, Swazoo is 100%
> > under the LGPL, no ifs no buts no doubt.
> This is exactly the kind of situation Squeak needs to stay far away
> from. How much infected code are we talking about here? Personally I
> was considering going with Swazoo for some business websites I'm
> doing, but this answers that question for me.
This is the same for Seaside. All packages in the Seaside 2.9
repository are MIT licensed, including the Seaside-Swazoo adapters. If
there is the slightest doubt on one of the packages in there, we have
to move it somewhere else.
More information about the Squeak-dev