[squeak-dev] Re: Swazoo - LGPL or MIT?

Lukas Renggli renggli at gmail.com
Sat Mar 22 07:05:02 UTC 2008

>  >  If you manage to persuade the people who contributed to Swazoo to
>  >  switch the license, then fair enough.  Until then, Swazoo is 100%
>  >  under the LGPL, no ifs no buts no doubt.
> This is exactly the kind of situation Squeak needs to stay far away
>  from.  How much infected code are we talking about here?  Personally I
>  was considering going with Swazoo for some business websites I'm
>  doing, but this answers that question for me.

This is the same for Seaside. All packages in the Seaside 2.9
repository are MIT licensed, including the Seaside-Swazoo adapters. If
there is the slightest doubt on one of the packages in there, we have
to move it somewhere else.


Lukas Renggli

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list