[squeak-dev] Re: Swazoo - LGPL or MIT?

Paolo Bonzini bonzini at gnu.org
Sat Mar 22 08:52:57 UTC 2008

Lukas Renggli wrote:
>>  >  If you manage to persuade the people who contributed to Swazoo to
>>  >  switch the license, then fair enough.  Until then, Swazoo is 100%
>>  >  under the LGPL, no ifs no buts no doubt.
>> This is exactly the kind of situation Squeak needs to stay far away
>>  from.  How much infected code are we talking about here?  Personally I
>>  was considering going with Swazoo for some business websites I'm
>>  doing, but this answers that question for me.
> This is the same for Seaside. All packages in the Seaside 2.9
> repository are MIT licensed, including the Seaside-Swazoo adapters. If
> there is the slightest doubt on one of the packages in there, we have
> to move it somewhere else.

There is none, see the discussion between me and Andreas (I audited the 
code in Seaside-Swazoo).


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list