[squeak-dev] Re: Swazoo - LGPL or MIT?
stephane ducasse
stephane.ducasse at free.fr
Sun Mar 23 09:28:51 UTC 2008
argh!
Reading that thread was good!
Re-argh!
We should really be strict on MIT all the way down.
On Mar 22, 2008, at 7:20 PM, Jason Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> I don't understand why I am still subscribed to this mailing list
>> if all
>> I can read here is shit like this. Why should the FSF give a damn
>> about
>> Seaside?
>
> I don't know, but I don't know why they would care about CLISP either:
>
> http://clisp.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/clisp/clisp/doc/Why-CLISP-is-under-GPL
>
> I don't know what makes RMS want to go after someone but I find it
> best to simply avoid these kinds of situations. (Also note the
> extreme views by the FSF founder in this email exchange do not seem to
> agree with what has been said in this thread).
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|