Squeak Release Roadmap? (Was:Re: [squeak-dev] Notes from Release Team meeting 2)

Giovanni Corriga giovanni at corriga.net
Mon Mar 24 00:08:17 UTC 2008


Matthew Fulmer ha scritto:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 04:41:28PM +0000, Giovanni Corriga wrote:
>> Igor Stasenko ha scritto:
>>> We can divide things/initiatives onto subprojects and place this on a
>>> web page. This will serve good both for historical and organizational
>>> reasons.
>>> This will help community (and newcomers) to be certain in what
>>> direction we are moving and what most of us want to see in next
>>> release.
>>
>> What would help even better is having a time-boxed release cycle, so that 
>> the community and the other stakeholder can know in advance _when_ the next 
>> release will happen (with some approximation, of course).
> 
> I'll try to do that. I think 4.0 could be ready in 2-3 months.
> 

Hmm, is that enough time for a proper alpha-beta-gamma cycle with 
significant improvements to the image? Or are you suggesting that for 
4.0 we simply move to an MIT-licensed Kernel Image, without further changes?

	Giovanni



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list