[squeak-dev] Re: On the swazoo list
bonzini at gnu.org
Tue Mar 25 08:00:31 UTC 2008
>> I am very sorry to hear that. It is not my intention to harm other
>> projects but rather to protect my own. I have a large code base now
>> that relies on Hyper and Hyper derives from early versions of Swazoo,
>> so just like you I do have "practical impacts" to worry about. This
>> is not just a game.
> Out of honest curiosity, how would these large code bases be harmed by
> Swazoo being under MIT instead of LGPL? (I am assuming that by
> "protecting your own project" you mean that these projects would be
> harmed by the use of MIT)
Yes, this I don't understand either.
Hyper can still be LGPL if Swazoo turns to MIT.
More information about the Squeak-dev