On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 6:20 AM, Reinout Heeck <reinz at desk.org> wrote:

> I was appalled at the direction this thread took, it seemed centered
> around self-interest (paraphrasing: "we *have* to get MIT on Swazoo")
> rather than the obvious conclusion that Swazoo had entered illegal
> territory.


Please, let's not be so quick to attribute to malice that which was probably
just an honest mistake or momentary lapse in judgment.  I think he's
corrected the issue and that's the most important point.

That said, I would like to understand Bruce's reluctance to make his
contributions available under the MIT license.  I think it safe to say that
most people here prefer that license and that it's been established as the
preferred license for squeak contributions.  We should all respect Bruce's
decision regarding his own code, but I would like to understand his thinking
on the matter.

- Stephen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20080325/5cdb07df/attachment.htm