Hi Has,

3.4 is a legacy based on a older customer we have using our software.

We are in the process of migrating, but the question is what the base will
be. We are very interested in Croquet as a base and also the recent work
with the HydraVM. I suspect we will port to 3.8 first.

We are also working on tools that will allow our software to move to any vm
version. Tansel can shed further light on this later on.

Cheers
John

On 17/03/2008, Germán Arduino <garduino at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Has:
>
> May be the persons indicated to respond are Tansel or John. But I can
> say that a lot of work is done on such image, with the systems of
> BluePlane, but precisely the porting of Monticello is to permit
> migrate more easily to newest Squeak versions.
>
> Cheers.
>
>
> 2008/3/16, Has van der Krieken <xs4hkr at gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi Germán,
> >
> >  I was wondering, is there particular a reason why you or (BluePlane)
> >  are still using Squeak 3.4?
> >
> >  Regards, Has.
> >
> >
> >  On 3/12/08, Germán Arduino <garduino at gmail.com> wrote:
> >  > Hi:
> >  >
> >  >  I ported a suitable version of Monticello to work on Squeak 3.4
> >  >  images. This work was done to BluePlane, the Tansel Ersavas and John
> >  >  Magnifico company and on their name I'm announcing this. If someone
> is
> >  >  interested just drop a mail and I will send (or put to download) the
> >  >  .cs.
> >  >
> >  >  Cheers.
> >  >
> >  >  gsa.
> >  >
> >  >
> >
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20080327/e7813312/attachment.htm