[squeak-dev] [ANN] Monticello backport to Squeak 3.4
Germán Arduino
garduino at gmail.com
Fri Mar 28 22:55:22 UTC 2008
I don't believe to be a "die hard" squeaker but one that give big
importance to the stability.
In such sense all my production projects are currently on 3.8 (and 1
or 2 on 3.7).
I don't think will invest time to migrate to 3.9, may be 3.10 or the
next one, depending of the customer needs and the improvements I need.
To my own playing I'm using mostly 3.10.
HTH.
Germán.
2008/3/28, Has van der Krieken <xs4hkr at gmail.com>:
> Hello John,
>
> Thanks for answering that. I was suspecting that client support was a
> main reason for backporting. I'm into Squeak and Smalltalk since
> version 3.7. That's not so long.
> I can't judge over the progression and improvements that Squeak has
> made the last couple of years. When version 3.9 was released I had get
> to used to the look-and-feel of it. I was wondering if the die hard
> Squeakers have, for any reason, a favourite version.
>
> Regards, Has.
>
>
> On 3/27/08, John Magnifico <john.magnifico at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Has,
> >
> > 3.4 is a legacy based on a older customer we have using our software.
> >
> > We are in the process of migrating, but the question is what the base will
> > be. We are very interested in Croquet as a base and also the recent work
> > with the HydraVM. I suspect we will port to 3.8 first.
> >
> > We are also working on tools that will allow our software to move to any vm
> > version. Tansel can shed further light on this later on.
> >
> > Cheers
> > John
> >
> >
> > On 17/03/2008, Germán Arduino <garduino at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Has:
> > >
> > > May be the persons indicated to respond are Tansel or John. But I can
> > > say that a lot of work is done on such image, with the systems of
> > > BluePlane, but precisely the porting of Monticello is to permit
> > > migrate more easily to newest Squeak versions.
> > >
> > > Cheers.
> > >
> > >
> > > 2008/3/16, Has van der Krieken <xs4hkr at gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > Hi Germán,
> > > >
> > > > I was wondering, is there particular a reason why you or (BluePlane)
> > > > are still using Squeak 3.4?
> > > >
> > > > Regards, Has.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 3/12/08, Germán Arduino <garduino at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hi:
> > > > >
> > > > > I ported a suitable version of Monticello to work on Squeak 3.4
> > > > > images. This work was done to BluePlane, the Tansel Ersavas and John
> > > > > Magnifico company and on their name I'm announcing this. If someone
> > is
> > > > > interested just drop a mail and I will send (or put to download) the
> > > > > .cs.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers.
> > > > >
> > > > > gsa.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|