Janko Mivšek wrote:
> For enhancing the clarity of Teams page I'm brainstorming possible 
> reorganization of teams list, by introducing a hierarchy, something 
> like this:
>
> Teams
>
>   General
>
>     Box Admins
Alive
>     Documentation Team
mathew ?
>     Election
once a year
>
>     News
alive
>     Release Team (here or below?)
almost
>     Web Team
alive
>
>   Stewards (or Technical?)
all these seem dead.
Looking trough the mail list archives will tell which groups are moving. 
I think we can remove references to the stewards and lists that have not 
been used for the last year. This kind of stale info on the website just 
confuse and give a wrong picture of the community.

Karl
>
>     Balloon Stewards
>     Compression Stewards
>     FFI Stewards
>     Graphics Stewards
>     I/O Stewards
>     Modules
>     Morphic Stewards
>     Packages
>     Software Engineering Team
>     ToolBuilder
>
>
> Is this enough or should we introduce some other subcategory too (like 
> Other)?
>
> What are the Stewards? I don't find the explanation on the team page. 
> Description in one sentence?
>
> What are the coordinators? Description of their role is missing too.
>
> I would also put column with team leader names  before coordinators, 
> because they are most important and responsible for the team, more 
> than coordinators (which are from the Board, right?).
>
> JAnko
>
>
> Janko Mivšek wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I'm just looking at the Team list on 
>> http://www.squeak.org/Community/Teams/ and wondering, how many those 
>> teams are still actual or alive. For the sake of clarity I'll put on 
>> that list only those teams, which are current and alive. Others can 
>> be put to the separate web page (team archive, past teams or 
>> something). What do you think?
>>
>> Also, please check if the information is up to date, if team leaders 
>> and coordinators are the right ones etc.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Janko Mivšek from the Web team
>>
>>
>>
>