2008/5/13 Edgar J. De Cleene <edgardec2001 at yahoo.com.ar>:
>
>
>
> El 5/13/08 2:13 AM, "Philippe Marschall" <philippe.marschall at gmail.com>
> escribió:
>
>> That's a personal opinion. There are people who need and want Tratis.
>
>
> Off course, read what I said
>>>  But  if people choose we should have Traits as in 3.10, they have all as
> is
>>  now.
>
> I don't cut any...yet.
> And I don't do if Board said this is a bad idea.
> And I don't cut if I see any reasonable thing (not a exercise) need Traits
> and could not be made without Traits.
> And I don't cut if see many people ask for keep Traits .
>
>> No just really hard and there are the usual questions how you can make
> two
>> different versions work together.
>
> Well , we have several versions of Monticello now, crucial for all.
> And people just is discovering this.
> And Keith Hodges is doing work in this area.
>
> So I confident my idea of unloading Traits and having Traits.mcz ,
> BestTraits.mcz , SuperTraitsBestAsOthersCrap33.1.3.mcz is a better way.

I think you underestimate the effort that went into 3.9.

Cheers
Philippe

> No progress is made without compromises.
> The way to heaven is hard and full of obstacles, the way to hell is always
> the easier one.
>
> Cheers
>
> Edgar
>
>
>
>