[squeak-dev] Redoing 3.10: License cleaning
Randal L. Schwartz
merlyn at stonehenge.com
Thu May 15 20:01:28 UTC 2008
>>>>> "David" == David Mitchell <david.mitchell at gmail.com> writes:
David> Depends on how confident you are in VPRI's license cleanliness. I
David> don't mean any offense, to VPRI.
If VPRI would also promise to indemnify any derivative work by setting up a
legal defense fund, this would be one possibility. I mean, the real purpose
of any license is to have something to help you in court. And money goes a
long ways. :)
However, I can't imagine any shareholder that would approve such a deal,
unless there was a good business case.
That said, I haven't asked anyone at VPRI. I would just be surprised.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn at stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|