[squeak-dev] Re: Bogus Class Category in 3.10.1-7175 - Mantis #7070
Klaus D. Witzel
klaus.witzel at cobss.com
Wed May 28 17:24:29 UTC 2008
On Wed, 28 May 2008 19:02:01 +0200, Ken Causey wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 18:47 +0200, Klaus D. Witzel wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 May 2008 17:59:14 +0200, Ken Causey wrote:
> ...
>> > I made a mistake when building 3.10.1-7175, you can look at
>> >
>> > http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7070
>> >
>> > For more of the gorey details.
>> >
>> > My point with this email, other than to apologize, is to ask what I
>> > should do. ...
>>
>> I'd say: put a text (big letters from default font) into that .image and
>> update 3.10.1-7175-basic.zip; an explanation of what's wrong with the
>> .image and what to do from here.
>>
>> This will not address possible problems of people who have already
>> downloaded the current one but, that's easy to find out: they can be
>> asked
>> if they see the text.
>
> Thanks, that's a good idea and something I will do as soon as I find a
> way to fix this in the existing image.
You are probably already aware that
(SystemOrganization allMethodSelectors "does #elements"
reject: [:missing | Smalltalk includesKey: missing])
do: [:missing | SystemOrganization basicRemoveElement: missing]
still leaves some existing classes in category Morphic-CandidatesForGo.
> Ken
>
>> /Klaus
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|