How close is MC 2?  And wouldn't that remove the need for 1.5?  I
thought 1.5 was a stop gap for until MC 2 was finished?

On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou at gmail.com> wrote:
> Do anybody agree for a reinclusion of MC1.5 in squeak-dev 3.10 images?
>
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 5:34 AM, Keith Hodges <keith_hodges at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> I am sorry it has taken so long... they all turned out to be simpler than
>> expected.
>>
>> 1. The corrupted instVars bug - sorted : thanks to Matthews investigative
>> work it turned out to be a really simple fix.
>>
>> 2. The FFI doesnt load bug - sorted : thanks to Andreas for his inspiration
>> as to how to fix that.
>>
>>
>> The best way to load FFI is (because it includes the prequisite fix for
>> NetNameResolver)...
>>
>> Start with LevelPlayingField see
>> http://installer.pbwiki.com/LevelPlayingField
>>
>> Installer install: 'Packages'.
>> Installer sake addPackage: 'FFI'; install.
>>
>> enjoy because MC1.5 has finally made it to what I had intended all along,
>> and it passes Lukas' nasty test case.
>>
>> Keith
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Damien Cassou
> Peter von der Ahé: «I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good
> luck». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu)
>
>