[squeak-dev] Re: broken releases (was: [BUG]UndefinedObject(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #emphasis:)

Greg A. Woods; Planix, Inc. woods at planix.ca
Wed Nov 19 21:37:03 UTC 2008

On 19-Nov-2008, at 3:31 PM, Ken Causey wrote:

> This method of reporting bugs was deprecated years and years ago,  
> please
> use our bugs database, http://bugs.squeak.org/ , for 'official'  
> reports.
> That being said it's not a bad idea to ask for sanity checks on the
> mailing list first and I will consider this email to be that.

Well when the standard menu option to submit a bug report does what it  
does then that's what I would consider the "official" way to do things.

BTW, any bug reporting system that doesn't have a proper true e-mail  
interface is unusable, at least by me.  If there's an e-mail alias  
that imports standard reports into the bug database then please let me  
know what it is (and where the tools are to format the standard  

> Whisker has not been updated for quite a while, it's not too  
> surprising
> that you have found a problem with it.

I don't understand why broken and/or untested things are in the  
official Package Universe list.

> My understanding of the Package Universe was that it was meant to only
> include packages known to work.

I would hope so too.

					Greg A. Woods; Planix, Inc.
					<woods at planix.ca>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20081119/4ff32644/PGP.pgp

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list