[squeak-dev] Re: what is holding back Smalltalk?
bert at freudenbergs.de
Fri Nov 21 15:16:46 UTC 2008
On 21.11.2008, at 16:09, Sophie (itsme213) wrote:
> "Igor Stasenko" <siguctua at gmail.com> wrote in message
>> I think that one of the major drawbacks of smalltalk is its 80's
>> implementation which offers 0 (zero) modularity.
>> I hoping this will change in near future.
Well, other Smalltalks are more modular, so we can safely conclude
that that is not what's holding back Smalltalk.
(but I do agree we should strive for modularity in Squeak of course)
- Bert -
More information about the Squeak-dev