Text file was just an example. But the files could be images, binaries, etc.
Then there are folders or directories too. A complete solution would be
great for testing and quality assurance in general.
Aik-Siong Koh



Joshua Gargus-2 wrote:
> 
> The quickest approach is to simply define a method that answers a String
> with the test input.  Is that insufficient for some reason?
> 
> Cheers,
> Josh
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Matthew Fulmer wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:24:31PM -0700, askoh wrote:
>>   
>>> I would like store some ordinary text files that are used as test inputs
>>> to
>>> some code. How can I save a Monticello package with the test text files
>>> together with the code? Can I do that without making the text files as
>>> code
>>> in Squeak?
>>>     
>>
>> No. I'm pretty sure we havn't yet implemented that feature. I'll
>> start working on it next week or so
>>
>>   
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Storing-non-code-files-in-Monticello-tp20016782p20026042.html
Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.