El 9/6/08 3:30 AM, "Trygve Reenskaug" <trygver at ifi.uio.no> escribió:

> Great! But why a .sar file? It would be much easier for me with the MPEG file
> itself. 
> Thanks
> --Trygve
 I talking about a .sar which could be loaded into 3.10.
The MPEG is for look, the .sar is for work
If people could have Baby in his current image you have more feedback IMHO.

Edgar