David Farber wrote:
> I've got 2G of memory on my physical machine.  The core dump is just 
> under 200M (from a ~40M image).  Will I need to start Squeak with extra 
> memory?  How do I determine the correct start/end address?  And it looks 
> like the bits of the original process is split into a whole bunch of 
> chunks in the core dump.  Will the interpreter simulator be able to 
> handle that?

I don't think it will and I can't tell you how to figure out the base 
address of the image either. But I do think that if you can figure this 
out you can stitch together a virtual image file that you read into the 
interpreter and have the interpreter doing any magic that you need, 
including extracting your data or conceivably writing out a new image 
file. I've never done any of it myself but I think this is your best 
option here if you really need the data as desperately.

Cheers,
   - Andreas