Well the change set mechanism lets you create new change sets and move
individual changes between them however you like.  Then I would assume
MC2 has some way to select which change set to record.  I don't know
how it works in practice but it could be something even nicer than
what Darcs has from a UI point of view.

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Frank Shearar
<frank.shearar at angband.za.org> wrote:
> Jason Johnson wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Frank Shearar
>> <frank.shearar at angband.za.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> That cherry-picking business of darcs', though: man, that just rocks.
>>> When
>>> you say "darcs record" it walks you through the hunks in a file, and you
>>> can
>>> just say "yes, I'll record this hunk, no, not that hunk". (I'd dearly
>>> love
>>> to see something like this in MC!)
>>>
>>
>> I thought MC2 could work from change sets?  If so, you have this now
>> and with an even handier interface.  Just arrange the change sets how
>> you want them with the change sorter, then commit it with MC2.  Am I
>> correct?
>>
>
> I've not used MC2, so if you can selectively commit parts of what you've
> changed, I'd be very happy. Or, to make me just as happy, point out the MC1
> feature I'd missed.
>
> frank
>
> PS I'm _trying_ to get Thunderbird to send this using text/plain; apologies
> if I fail.
>
>