[squeak-dev] Recent standalone Squeak ports, and recent hardware to run them?

Michael van der Gulik mikevdg at gmail.com
Thu Apr 9 00:38:56 UTC 2009


On 4/9/09, Jecel Assumpcao Jr <jecel at merlintec.com> wrote:
>> allowing user changes to the system, and preventing users from
>> making the entire machine unusable?
>
> My proposal is to use a separate system image and a user image. You
> can't allow full access without also allowing accidents, but a little
> structure goes a long way towards eliminating the latter. I described
> this in a post to the SqueakNOS list:

...so you'd have one acting as the operating system, and one acting as
the application?

Gulik.

-- 
http://gulik.pbwiki.com/



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list