[squeak-dev] Re: Inbox

Andreas Raab andreas.raab at gmx.de
Wed Aug 12 15:50:43 UTC 2009


Good questions. How do the Pharo people deal with these issues? Anybody 
know?

Cheers,
   - Andreas

Ken Causey wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 14:49 +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>> I just merged a Monticello fix from the inbox (thanks Bernhard!) to  
>> the trunk. Now that this package is dealt with, what do we do? Perhaps  
>> we need an "inbox-merged" repository where we can move these packages?  
>> Or possibly two repositories for accepted and rejected packages? Can  
>> all developers move versions between repositories, or only admins?
>>
>> - Bert -
> 
> I have to say I've wondered about this myself.
> 
> Regarding 'who' moves them:  I assume you are asking about policy rather
> than technical capability.  Unless you are doing this some way I'm not
> aware of anyone who has write capability can do it.  In terms of policy
> I would be comfortable mapping it to capability, which is to say that
> all core-devs can move packages from inbox to trunk.
> 
> That said, you bring up a good point regarding tracking what has been
> done.  As it stands you have to see what is in inbox and then look at
> the listing in trunk to see if that file is in the listing there.  Of
> course that ignores the possibility that it's not actually in the
> ancestry of the current latest version and is ultimately overlooked that
> way.  It would also be useful to provide some easy feedback for those
> submitting issues to the inbox indicating when their submission has been
> accepted.  Perhaps it's time for our own SqueakSource branch.
> 
> Ken
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list