[squeak-dev] Re: Inbox
Andreas Raab
andreas.raab at gmx.de
Wed Aug 12 15:50:43 UTC 2009
Good questions. How do the Pharo people deal with these issues? Anybody
know?
Cheers,
- Andreas
Ken Causey wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 14:49 +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>> I just merged a Monticello fix from the inbox (thanks Bernhard!) to
>> the trunk. Now that this package is dealt with, what do we do? Perhaps
>> we need an "inbox-merged" repository where we can move these packages?
>> Or possibly two repositories for accepted and rejected packages? Can
>> all developers move versions between repositories, or only admins?
>>
>> - Bert -
>
> I have to say I've wondered about this myself.
>
> Regarding 'who' moves them: I assume you are asking about policy rather
> than technical capability. Unless you are doing this some way I'm not
> aware of anyone who has write capability can do it. In terms of policy
> I would be comfortable mapping it to capability, which is to say that
> all core-devs can move packages from inbox to trunk.
>
> That said, you bring up a good point regarding tracking what has been
> done. As it stands you have to see what is in inbox and then look at
> the listing in trunk to see if that file is in the listing there. Of
> course that ignores the possibility that it's not actually in the
> ancestry of the current latest version and is ultimately overlooked that
> way. It would also be useful to provide some easy feedback for those
> submitting issues to the inbox indicating when their submission has been
> accepted. Perhaps it's time for our own SqueakSource branch.
>
> Ken
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|