On 22.08.2009, at 22:55, Ian Trudel wrote:

> 2009/8/22 Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>:
>> Not sure what you mean by "load in memory". Why would you want to  
>> do that?
>
> The initial idea is to allow the community to provide fixes or
> improvements on the main project in the trunk. We cannot send
> separated files on the Monticello repository as far as I understand.
>
> For example, I have suggested to write something about the license in
> the "About this image" window. I simply add the text, save the project
> file. Then the code load the project into a class method but at that
> point, why would we save the file back on disk to load it again? It's
> slow and so many things can go wrong. I think it's better to load data
> from memory.


Okay. That makes sense.

- Bert -