+1

On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 00:07 +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> On 23.08.2009, at 23:51, Michael van der Gulik wrote:
> 
> > Hi all.
> >
> > Would it perhaps be better to have the automated trunk commit  
> > messages going to some other dedicated mailing list?
> >
> > Gulik.
> 
> 
> I was curious how long it would take the first one to speak up :)
> 
> No, I would rather create a squeak-users list for those not interested  
> in developing Squeak itself, but just "with" Squeak. IMHO the commits  
> messages make the community development process visible, which is a  
> Good Thing.
> 
> - Bert -

If we have to do anything about this then I think it is time we
seriously consider a separate "squeak users" mailing list.  I would
rather that users have to consider going from 'developer' to 'user'
rather than from 'user' to 'developer'; by which I mean that I would
prefer that we change the definition of squeak-dev and make another list
the 'user' list, rather than create a new developer list.  Perhaps we
should consider renaming the beginners list 'squeak-users' or the like.
This would have the added benefit of bringing more eyes to bear on
beginners requests.

Ken
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20090824/9a2c9d1d/attachment.pgp