[squeak-dev] Re: Alternatives to SMTPClient?
goran at krampe.se
Mon Dec 7 10:09:51 UTC 2009
Andreas Raab wrote:
> Göran Krampe wrote:
>> You could harvest my fixes for those things on mantis. :) I fixed both
>> the auth stuff and some other things.
> Thank you, thank you, thank you. The encodeString: issue was news to me.
Yeah, appeared when using Exim IIRC.
> Two question about correctness though:
> 1) Doesn't 2821 specify that a client SHOULD send EHLO first and only
> when declined, try HELO? Your fix seems to assume that the client knows
> that the server is going to understand EHLO.
May very well be correct - it was a looong time since I looked at that
> 2) Isn't the domain included in HELO/EHLO supposed to be the server's
> domain? You're using NetNameResolver localHostName which (in my
> understanding of the RFC) would only be correct when connecting to
Ah. Well, you are most probably right :) since I don't recall this stuff.
> - Andreas
Btw, we have had Gjallar systems sending quite a lot of email using
SMTPClient (but doing it in a separate Squeak process waking up and
popping a queue in Magma). My feeling is that it has been stable.
More information about the Squeak-dev